Thursday, May 30, 2013

Toxicological aspects of nanoparticles

Mr. Smith, stock broker for a famous firm, has interest in technology. So he always update his home electrical appliances and other gadgets regularly as there are no money constraints for him. Recently he purchased a new silver nanotechnology based washing machine. The sales person describe nanotechnology is the current highest technology which keeps the clothes away from bacteria and bad odour. A sales person knowing that much is good. He insisted on the beneficial part of nanoparticles and nanotechnology. Does he forget the other face of nanomaterials?! The toxic nature of nanoparticles, unfortunately, has become a major concern for environmentalists rather than general public. 

Do nanoparticles are toxic? Yes, nanoparticles are toxic but with high dosage concentrations. The study of nanoparticle toxicology is being carried out in many labs around the world and also publishing the results in many journals of various big publishers. The scientific community is concerned over the toxicity of the nanoparticles more than the policy makers and public. Nanoparticles are the smallest particles of metal or non metal or oxides etc., which are of the order thousand time lesser than micron size. Such small nanoparticles can reach to very end of the lungs, if inhaled, and very end of the blood vessels in the tissue if entered. Such a kind of particles are generally threat to the human body but thanks to god for giving such a strong immune system mechanism and defence processes, that the particles can be eliminated by RES system mostly, Urination etc. The problem comes when the dosage is high.

The high dosage of nanoparticles is toxic to cells which are the fundamental units of human body. The malfunction of a cell division leads to the generation of a bunch of immortal cells called as tumor and famous with the name "Cancer". Upto now we are talking about the toxicity of nanoparticles to healthy cells by dose dependent manner. Can't we use this aspect for the killling of cancer cells! A recent report in Nano Today authored by Stefan J. Soenen [1] reviewed the same aspect elaborately. The cancer cells are more prone to nanoparticle toxicity than the healthy cells which is an advantage to fight against cancer. The fluidity of the cancer cells enables the easy intake of nanoparticles which can act by two mechanisms. One way is to elicit the apoptosis pathway and the other one is the long term metal leaching. In the first mechanism, the nanoparticles are receptor mediated uptaken or by endocytosis stays for a long time inside the endosomes. The degeneration of the nanoparticles cause  pH changes in endosomes which then give signals to the nucleus to self destruct which is nothing but apoptosis. The other mechanism is the long term staying of the particle inside the cell and releasing the metal ions for a longer periods. These metal ions will be toxic to cells. It was proved that the metal ions alone given to cells are not affected than the cells given metal nanoparticles. The scientific understanding of the behaviour of nanoparticles toxicity to cells help in understanding the dose concentration and also the nanoparticle properties.

Toxicity studies of nanoparticles play a crucial role in understanding the demon of high dosage nanoparticles which can also become an angel in killing cancer cells. The two faces of nanoparticles is beneficial as per their application. The vibrant future of nanotechnology in providing the beneficial and commercial products is ahead.


[1]Stefaan J. Soenen, Jo Demeester, Stefaan C. De Smedt, Kevin Braeckmans. Turning a frown upside down: Exploiting nanoparticle toxicity for anticancer therapy.Nano Today (2013) 8, 121—125.











Monday, May 27, 2013

Drug delivery in Cancer



Cancer is an unanswerable question for researchers around the world from many decades. Exploring wide areas of biology, medicine and interdisciplinary fields like nanotechnology is going on to find a suitable molecule to kill cancer. The prescription of drugs (chemotherapy) to cancer patients by physicians across the globe after tumor removal is the current treatment modality. So the drugs play an important role in the treatment of cancer. The effectiveness of the drugs is limited while the side effects are more. But patients, as there is no other go, are ready to take these drugs.


From the last decade, the advent of nanotechnology in the delivery of medicine has paved the way for a new field called “Drug Delivery”. The main objective of this field is to develop various nanoformulation (a drug loaded nanocarrier) that is targeted to the specific diseased site, stay for a longer time in the body and minimizing side effects. Not every nanoformulation will fulfill all these three, but most of them will.


A recent development from Mc Neil’s Lab, part of the federally funded research and development center operated by SAIC-Frederick for the National Cancer Institute, worked with a drug company to reformulate TNF-alpha by coupling it with gold nanoparticles. Using the nanotechnology-enhanced protein, it appears possible to safely inject up to three times the amount that had been lethal with previous versions. The modified drug has been through a Phase 1 clinical trial and is entering Phase 2[1].
In future we can expect much more will come from many labs around the world and hope for a cancer free society.

[1] courtesy from Science daily, New Delivery for Cancer Drugs,May 7, 2013.



Sunday, May 26, 2013

The Power of Magnetic Nanoparticles as Detection Agents of Single Bacteria

 Nanotechnology based detection assays are not new within the last decade. A variety of unique strategies are being tried by various researchers around the world to identify the pathogenic bacteria using magnetic nanoparticles. 




 A recent paper published in nature nanotechnology reports the detection of a single pathogenic bacteria using DNA sandwich hybridization technique where the target DNA (analyte) is being sandwiched by the DNA attached to the magnetic nanoparticles. Here, the corresponding author Ralph Weissleder, a pioneer scientist and doctor, used polymeric nanoparticle conjugated with magnetic nanoparticles as magnetic beads which hosted the complementary DNA sequences to the target bacterial 16S ribosomal sRNA. The micro NMR is being used as the detection system. The micro NMR is the actual NMR which is fabricated to the micron size holds a sample of ~ 2 micro liters. The detection sensitivity of the bacterial RNA sequences were checked and validated over 13 pathogenic bacterial species. They claim that the system is robust in detection of pathogenic bacteria with high sensitivity. Besides, the same approach can be used to identify the unknown bacteria by employing the target specific primers attached to the magnetic beads. This is a dual approach for a single nanopaticle system.

The pros of this work are that they developed and validated an RT-PCR based bacterial detection assay with low sensitivity and high specificity.

The cons of this work are the cost issues where the procuring of the primer sequences and RT-PCR with all the enzymes are costly will be a non possible one except in very high infrastructure hospitals or clinics.



The image was made using Inkscape 0.48 version software